|
Just as the best data available was used to shoot the guns, so was the best data available used to lay the battery. Survey data was best, followed by map and compass methods. If at all possible, survey control would be brought into the battery area by the Battalion Survey Section. Surveying from known points, they would bring both directional control and location control in on the same survey. The chief effect of this for the purposes of laying are concerned is that the Orienting Line was under survey control. The OL was a line from the Aiming Circle to a stake, and was usually pointed at grid north (AZ 6400). By subtracting the azimuth of fire from the azimuth of the OL (Memory Aid: "take the fire out of the old lady") the XO could properly set up the Aiming Circle to lay the battery. Reciprocal Laying was accomplished by using either surveyed or magnetic reference to North. This reference was used to place settings on an aiming instrument called an "aiming circle, M2" whited looked and operated a great deal like a surveyor's transit. Located in a place so it could be seen by the sights (The M12A7D panoramic telescopes or "pan-tel"'s) of the guns, the Aiming Circle was used to measure angles from a direction of fire to the pan-tel. The angle would be then set off on the scale of the panel and the gun moved either manually or with the traversing mechanism until the gunner saw the aiming circle in his pan-tel's eyepiece. The process was then done over again. The difference in angles would get rapidly smaller. Usually on the third try, there would be no difference between the angle read to the sight and the angle read back to the Aiming Circle by the gunner. The object of the exercise was to get the axis of the bore of each gun to be parallel with the direction ("Azimuth") of lay. When opposite interior angles (the numbers read out by the XO and gunner on their respective instruments) got down to no difference, the angles were equal and the lines were parallel. Thank you, Pythagoras and Plane Geometry!
Laying could also be accomplished in a pinch be using a distant aiming point on the horizon, such as a lone tree or hill. After occupying a position, each Gun Chief would make note of the deflection to a designated distant aiming point. Our beautiful 155mm Howitzers were from the time when the bad guys were always to the front and the good guys always to the rear. As consequence the sights and gun carriages were designed to swing left and right center about 400 mils. When it became necessary to shoot at a target further left or right or behind us, the guns would need to be jacked up on their speed jacks and swung around to center the azimuth of fire towards the new target. At that point, we needed to lay the battery again. Since much of the night lighting on the sights and Aiming Circles were antiquated and inadequate, we used a lot of flashlights and D-cell batteries to get the job done at night. This could be a set of aiming stakes or an instrument called an "infinity reference collimator" which simulated a very distant aiming point. The reticle pattern in the pan-tel could look at the collimator or aiming stakes and make up for gun movement after each shot. Taking up the "piece displacement" meant that the guns were still pointed in the right direction. The collimator and aiming stakes were set out after the battery was laid. Once in place, a sliding scale on the pan-tel was set at a "referred deflection" in our case 2800 mils, so that despite irregularities in the areas around each howitzer, all sights would read the same numbers when looking at the stakes and collimators. |
| ©
Copyright 2001 - 1/92nd Field Artillery Association All rights under copyright are reserved. A Not for Profit Organization |
Comments
or questions to |